Each training style has advantages, disadvantages and particular uses, and it's important to understand all three. When it comes to training, there are three distinct styles: autocratic, democratic, and holistic. The styles are based on the studies of Kurt Lewin, a German-American social psychologist. Democratic training focuses more on communication between a coach and his athletes.
Instead of the coach having all the power in the autocratic style, a democratic coach encourages the participation of his athletes. The coach acts as a guide and supervises the suggestions so that swimmers can bounce back on them. Ultimately, the coach has the last word, but not without the suggestions and opinions of his athletes. This allows athletes to contribute an important role to the team and, at the same time, foster an environment based on growth and collaboration.
Trainers will use a variety of training styles depending on the training situation. There are perhaps three styles of training: autocratic (do as I say), democratic (involves athletes in decision-making) and laissez-faire. The autocratic style could be divided into two types: saying and selling and the democratic style, sharing and allowing. There is a bit of orientation in the Laissez Fair training style, as this style allows the group to do what they want.
These instruments measure a variety of training and leadership qualities and are useful in ensuring that a coach performs in the most effective manner for his client. It applies to coaches who want to assess and improve their strength of character when working with clients. Instead of establishing hierarchical control, the transformational coach acts in collaboration with the client and, at the same time, offers authentic support and honest feedback (Eagly et al. Instead of focusing on structured training, holistic coaching creates an enabling environment in which team members feel comfortable seeking out different skills and developing in their own way.
Any good coach must understand each style and how to use it in different contexts to achieve the best results. It's important to know what type of training style you respond best to in order to have a more effective and enjoyable relationship with your coach. Training styles are heavily influenced by personal experience and philosophy, and sticking with a single style is not an option for many trainers. Or, in the words of a coach: “You can never be a coach if you don't develop a player comprehensively.
It may take a little longer than other approaches to see results, but when it comes to performance training styles, it can be very effective, since the team has a responsibility to work together and explore solutions as a whole. It is based on the training leader having good communication and social skills, since constructive feedback is important in this leadership style, but the most successful coach will also ask his employees questions to encourage brainstorming and problem solving. In this qualitative study, coaches described the importance of taking a holistic perspective with students. This individual approach involves building an alliance of trust between coach and client in which both parties agree on training objectives and processes.
This training style is rigid, adheres to specific rules and follows a clear model that describes decision-making hierarchies. Employees under this training style show discipline and commitment, since the structure is there for them to succeed.
Leave Reply