Coaching is an essential part of any successful team or individual's development. It's important for those interested in pursuing a coaching career to understand the strengths and weaknesses of each style. A great coach adapts their training styles to meet the requirements of people and situations. It's essential to know your style and the styles of the people you're training.
For example, if you have a systematic team and you arrive as an energetic new coach, it can be difficult to train this team. Both sides need to come to an agreement: a good manager can appeal to their systematic side and, at the same time, use their energetic personality to achieve goals together. The evaluation measures a person's preference for direct, energetic, considerate, and systematic training styles. With this knowledge, people can better understand why they behave in their own way, learn to adapt their behavior to improve interpersonal relationships, develop a good relationship, and ultimately become more effective trainers. Throughout the coaching process, you'll learn that the best training style can be situational. It's common for a coach to use different training styles at different times depending on specific goals.
The best coaching styles may also depend on your client. Some clients respond very well to authoritarian training styles, while others like to feel more involved and prefer a democratic training style. Democratic training allows people who are being trained to be free and accountable. With this training style, the coach only steps in to keep the process on track. People who receive this type of training can often improve their decision-making and communication skills.
They can improve these skills because they are encouraged to share their opinions about their decisions and thoughts. This type of training may take longer to see results because it explores all the options for a solution. Authoritarian coaching is letting the coach make all the decisions. They decide what the customer is going to do, when they are going to do it and how, with the mutual understanding of the customer they are addressing. With this training style, clients learn discipline, set goals and work to achieve the results of their goals, and they learn discipline because they follow the instructions of their coach.
With those instructions, they set goals on how to achieve them and then work to achieve them and produce the desired result. Holistic coaching is about creating balance in all parts of decision-making. Coaches who use this style believe that everything in life connects, so finding harmony is essential for decisions to work. People who are trained in this style often feel that they have a sense of purpose, because examining all of their choices gives them a broader perspective on their choices, which can help them feel more connected to themselves. This training style can teach people relaxation techniques to help them make better decisions and learn to manage stress to produce effective solutions. Autocratic coaching involves the coach telling his clients what they should do, instead of asking them to do something.
This training style can teach people how to stay engaged and disciplined with a task. Coaches establish a specific structure to achieve and achieve a definite goal. Often, trainers may want to see their clients repeat the process after they've successfully done it the first time. This can lead to a feeling of maintaining commitment to processes and tasks if they know that they have been successful before.
Coaches strive to see excellence in this style. Visual coaching involves having the coach explain to their individuals what they are supposed to focus on during the session. While the coach gives explicit instructions, he encourages them to achieve their goals and to do their best. This training style is mainly based on people receiving feedback and applying it to their next goal. Coaches also encourage them to reflect on what they have done and learned so far and to talk about it, as this can encourage motivation because they can feel supported. This style usually works best in a fast-paced environment because it generates results.
The four training styles are reflected in the four different DISC styles: Dominant, Influential, Stable and Conscious. When determining which style is the most appropriate for your athlete, there are two key factors to consider. Essentially, this training style aims to help your clients interact more effectively with their lives and with the people around them. Instead, the holistic coach works to create an environment in which players feel comfortable exploring and pursuing skill development in their own time and in their own way. A mindfulness-focused coach may be especially useful for anxious clients, given the important relationship between mindfulness activities and the reduction of anxiety (Blanck, Perleth & Heidenreich et al.).
In addition to researching the physical changes that the client can make to improve their health, a holistic coach will also analyze lifestyle factors, relationships, and stress levels to see how they may be affecting their health. An effective way to ensure your training style is to conduct a CoachDisc survey on athlete evaluations. Instead of having an open dialogue between the coach and the client, the autocratic coach makes all the decisions and the client moves forward with little or no participation in decision-making. Working with a qualified and experienced performance coach will challenge but support the individual, allowing them to perform at their best more often. As mindfulness and meditation are now used to treat conditions such as stress and depression, this training approach may be especially useful for clients suffering from anxiety and depression. Understanding the coach and adapting from an intermediate point of view creates trust between the coach and athlete.
At its base is a personal philosophy that takes into account three training styles: your own personal experiences; your particular worldview; courageously creating changes; feeling dissatisfied; restless; underperforming; physical changes; lifestyle factors; relationships; stress levels; CoachDisc survey; open dialogue; autocratic coaching; qualified performance coach; mindfulness; meditation; anxiety; depression.